Choosing Between LD & Zirconia

Many of your dental patients may not be familiar with the advantages of new materials—Lithium Disilicate or Zirconia—for dental restorations over traditional PFM material, but CAD/CAM and Ceramic technologies are rapidly replacing PFMs. Biogenic Dental Laboratories offers high-quality e.max (Lithium Disilicate) and Zirlux FC2 (Zirconia) restorations for your every need.

There are many advantages to using LD or Zirconia over PFM, but there are also many factors that might influence your choosing one material over another for your patients’ dental restorations. Each material has its own advantages and suggested uses. For example:

  • Strength: Zirlux FC2 Zirconia has high flexural strength, up to 1400 mPa, and is kinder to opposing dentition than Type III Gold Alloy. Studies show that wear to the opposing dentition is not caused by material hardness but by surface abrasion or the “sandpaper effect”. When we process Zirconia, the surface is highly polished and glazed, making it very smooth. Zirconia is also more wear-resistant than gold, therefore retaining its original anatomical shape, and will not adversely effect the opposing dentition due to wear deformation from mastication of food or prolonged brushing. E.max Lithium Disilicate material, with a lower flexural strength of up to 400 mPa, is designed for maximum anterior esthetics and beauty.
  • Esthetics/Accuracy in Shade Matching: High-translucency e.max Lithium Disilicate is recommended where esthetics is paramount—for example, in cases where you need to exactly match the shade of a single anterior tooth. For overall smile designs, or other situations where individual teeth do not need critical shade-matching, Biogenic Dental Labs recommends Zirlux FC2 Zirconia materials.
  • The advancement in the Zirconia (we use ZirluxFC2) allows for much better shade matching and no white spots like the older Brux-Zir zirconia product.
  • Thinness: Because Zirlux FC2 Zirconia materials are so strong, they can be made thin—meaning that you can be more conservative in your preparation, saving more of patients’ original tooth structure. Zirlux FC2 Zirconia may be as thin as ½ mm; the minimum thinness of e.max Lithium Disilicate materials is 1.5 mm to 2 mm.
  • Cementing Process: e.max Lithium Disilicate materials need to be etched and bonded to place, while Zirlux FC2 Zirconia can be conventionally cemented, making the process easier.

Biogenic Dental Laboratories is here to help you choose the right quality digital dental restorations for your patients. Our experienced technologists design all Zirconia and LD cases in a virtual environment, which means achieving optimal esthetic results for your patients when restoring teeth. Talk with us at 1-800-367-3322 and connect with our years of expertise and passion for creating the best digital dental restorations in Central New York!

  1 comment for “Choosing Between LD & Zirconia

  1. June 5, 2014 at 2:11 am

    Greetings I am so delighted I found your blog, I really found you by error,
    while I was searching on Askjeeve for something else, Regardless I am here now and would just like to say thanks for a incredible post and a all round
    interesting blog (I also love the theme/design), I
    don’t have time to look over it all at the moment but I have saved it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have
    time I will be back to read a lot more, Please
    do keep up the great jo.

Leave a comment